A High-Touch Process That Was Hard to Scale
MasonHub’s onboarding process was already well-structured. There was a mutual action plan, a detailed playbook, and a team that genuinely cared about client outcomes. But as volume grew, the cracks started to show.
With six phases running concurrently across each client project — and clients jumping between Slack, email, and Google Sheets — the team found themselves acting more as switchboard operators than strategic partners. Time that should have gone toward resolving integration issues or reviewing SOPs was being eaten up by administrative follow-ups and manual tracking.
Making it harder: MasonHub’s client base spans a wide range of operational maturity. Well-resourced brands with experienced ops teams would dive into the portal immediately and move fast. Others, particularly smaller brands with fractional leadership, found the process overwhelming. Calibrating the experience to fit both types of client, without a system built for it, added another layer of strain.
The key pain points:
- Two onboarding specialists managing six to ten clients simultaneously, with no scalable system for visibility or follow-up
- Client communication spread across email, Slack, and Google Sheets, with no single source of truth
- No structured milestone tracking for executive reporting — weekly summaries had to be assembled manually
- Difficulty getting clients to self-serve and stay engaged after the initial kickoff
- A 30–50 day average time-to-live, with outliers caused by clients who stalled mid-process